To preserve, rehab, restore, or reconstruct a structure - a building, a house - of significant historical value can be a huge dilemma. For one, it will always involve a lot of money.
“„Fundamental to the question is integrity, significance, and economic viability.- David Bell, FAIA, LEED AP, BD+C
“„Preservation is most viable when there is a great deal of integrity, continuous use that is consistent with the historical use and limited increase or change in economic demands.- David Bell, FAIA, LEED AP, BD+C
“„Rehabilitation is the approach most applicable to our practice. Much of our work is related to modernizing systems and enclosures in historic buildings to meet current demands for energy efficiency, comfort, life safety, and accessibility.- David Bell, FAIA, LEED AP, BD+C
“„While rehabilitation can have some areas or elements that are restored, this approach allows for some flexibility to incorporate new systems and change spatial configurations; it is suited to adaptive reuse. There are federal rehabilitation tax credits applicable to this approach - which are also available for restoration projects as well.- David Bell, FAIA, LEED AP, BD+C
“„Restoration is a more of an academic approach, requiring rigor in research and application. It is often related to a use similar to the period of significance.- David Bell, FAIA, LEED AP, BD+C
“„It’s not uncommon for historic house museums to fall into this category. Sometimes these will be eligible for grants with associated conservation easements.- David Bell, FAIA, LEED AP, BD+C
“„It is probably the least common of the approaches. This can be a tricky approach, while it is hard to avoid conjecture without having a great deal of documentation. One of the most well-known examples is Colonial Williamsburg.- David Bell, FAIA, LEED AP, BD+C
“„At STIR Architecture, we consider many factors when determining the right approach, as the order of importance of the concepts can shift these depending on the intended use and the source of funding.- James C. Auld, AIA, CDP
“„Budget and funding sources, project location, the building and site condition, the context and the future intended use, if different than the historic use, as well as the intended outcome of a project, influence our choice of approach.- James C. Auld, AIA, CDP
“„We may borrow from all four approaches - especially when the historic use is being replaced with a newer one.- James C. Auld, AIA, CDP
“„When the project will remain in its original use, we may only employ a preservation approach to stabilize the structure, make it safe, and more resilient to damage from earthquake, fire, or wind.- James C. Auld, AIA, CDP
“„Our work to date with historic buildings has focused on a combination of approaches, which results in the greatest benefit relative to the cost. For example, at Los Angeles’ Engine Co. 28, we added an additional office level on top of the main roof, behind an existing parapet.- James C. Auld, AIA, CDP
“„The parapet fronts the only significant façade and allowed a change of use from fire house to creative office on levels above ground and a ground level restaurant.- James C. Auld, AIA, CDP
“„Our work retained all of the significant features - the brick, stone, tile façade, great massive doors, ambience of the engine room, its paneled and tin ceiling and the fire pole linking to the floor above - while introducing new features to this 1928 monument in downtown Los Angeles.- James C. Auld, AIA, CDP